111 is the emergency number for Police, Fire and Ambulance. A written warning ticket is a document issued by law enforcement officers to let you know that they noticed an infraction on the road (speeding, parking, etc.). that if the allegation of gross misconduct is proved, the officer may be subject to a finding that the officer would have been dismissed if the officer had not ceased to be a member of a police force or a special constable; that if the officer is subject to such a finding, information including the officers full name and a description of the conduct which would have led to the officers dismissal will be added to the police barred list and may be subject to publication for a period of up to 5 years; after sub-paragraph (g), and were omitted and there were inserted, that it may harm the officers case if the officer fails to attend an interview of which the officer has been given notice under regulation 20(6) (interviews during investigation), and. Information in documents which are stated to be subject to the harm test under these Regulations must not be supplied to the officer concerned in so far as the appropriate authority considers that preventing disclosure to the officer is. prohibit the publication of any matter under regulation 39(3)(c). This is the original version (as it was originally made). If the ticket is reported to DPS, the revenue from the ticket is split, the municipality writing it keeping the smaller fraction. (2)Except as set out in paragraph (8), these Regulations also apply, with the modifications set out in Schedule 1, where, (a)an allegation comes to the attention of a relevant body which indicates that the conduct of a person who at the time of the alleged conduct was a police officer (P) may amount to gross misconduct(33), and. Mistakes on traffic tickets occur when officers are in a hurry or absentmindedly jot down incorrect information. given to the officer in any other manner agreed between the person who is required to give the notice or document and the officer. Where the question of disciplinary action for gross misconduct is being considered, the person or persons considering it, the appropriate authority or the person appointed to represent such authority in accordance with regulation 8(5); and, The person chairing a misconduct hearing must provide any information to the appropriate authority that the person considers ought to be included by virtue of regulation 3(2)(l) of the Police Barred List and Police Advisory List Regulations 2017, Advanced Search (including Welsh legislation in Welsh language), http://www.college.police..uk/en/20989.htm, the original print PDF of the as enacted version that was used for the print copy, lists of changes made by and/or affecting this legislation item, confers power and blanket amendment details, links to related legislation and further information resources, the original print PDF of the as made version that was used for the print copy. paragraph 18 or 19 of Schedule 3 to the2002 Act(directed and independent investigations) applied, or, paragraph 16 of Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act (investigations by the appropriate authority on its own behalf) applied andthe Director General. 105 is the number for Police non-emergencies. Paragraph 24(6) of Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act was substituted by section 127 of, and paragraphs 1, 3 and 14(1) and (6) of Schedule 23 to, the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 and was amended by section 95 of, and paragraphs 1 and 14(1) and (3) of Schedule 14 to, the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 and section 16 of, and paragraphs 9, 27(1) and (2) and 47(h)(xiii) of Schedule 5 to, the Policing and Crime Act 2017. (b)request a response to any such question from the officer concerned within a specified period. an appeal from misconduct proceedings or from an accelerated misconduct hearing under the Police Appeals Tribunals Rules 2020(15), but, for the purposes of the following provisions, disciplinary proceedings only includes misconduct proceedings mentioned in paragraph (a) and a hearing mentioned in paragraph (b) of this definition. (3)Where the Director General has made a decision under regulation 24(1) to present a case, the appropriate authority must. (14)This paragraph applies where the case was certified as one where the special conditions are satisfied following a determination made under regulation 49(3), being a case where misconduct proceedings have been delayed by virtue of regulation 10(3). gave a direction under paragraph 27(4)(a) of that Schedule (duties with respect to disciplinary proceedings). (3)The person determining the appeal may extend the time period specified in paragraph (2) where they consider that it would be in the interests of justice to do so. (d)revised terms of reference under paragraph (5). it must, subject to regulation 10(3), refer the case to misconduct proceedings of the form specified. (14)The person determining the appeal must determine whether the notice of appeal sets out arguable grounds of appeal and if they decide that it does not, they must dismiss the appeal. (c)the effect of paragraphs (6) to (9) of this regulation. misconduct proceedings means a misconduct hearing;; (x)for the definition of police force concerned, there were substituted, the police force of which the officer concerned was a member at the relevant time, or. (3)Where the officer concerned is a senior officer, the accelerated misconduct hearing must be conducted by a panel of persons specified in paragraph (4), appointed by the local policing body. (b)any criminal proceedings have concluded (whatever the outcome of those proceedings). Explanatory Memorandum sets out a brief statement of the purpose of a Statutory Instrument and provides information about its policy objective and policy implications. a written report on the investigation to that point. A written warning from a police officer to a driver is in lieu of a traffic ticket. This is a debugging block . (14)At the misconduct pre-hearing the chair may issue directions including, but not limited to, the matters set out in this regulation, other than paragraph (8)(f). (4)The appropriate authority must send a copy of any report under this regulation to, (ii)was entitled to attend to make representations under regulation 58(1), and. (iii)the originating authority, where functions have been delegated under regulation 26(1); (iv)the Director General, where the Director General. Email; A Suffolk Constabulary officer was given a final written warning on Monday 10 January after a disciplinary hearing was told that he had attempted to form an inappropriate relationship with a vulnerable woman he came into . (10A)Where evidence is given or considered at the misconduct hearing that the officer concerned was given written notice of an interview under regulation 20(6) (interviews during investigation) of these Regulations or under regulation 21(6)(a) of the Complaints and Misconduct Regulations and failed to attend the interview, paragraph (13) applies.; (i)after regulation 18(1) there were inserted , 20A(2); (ii)after regulation 20 there were inserted or 21A(2); (iii)after Regulations, there were inserted (as modified by regulation 42 of and Schedule 2 to those Regulations). (6)Before the end of 10 working days beginning with the first working day after the date on which the officer concerned has complied with regulation 31(2), the appropriate authority or, as the case may be, the originating authority must supply to the person conducting or chairing the misconduct proceedings a copy of. (10)Where the Director General is entitled to attend the misconduct proceedings to make representations under regulation 38(1), or to nominate a person to attend the proceedings as an observer under regulation 40(6), the appropriate authority must give the Director General written notice of the date, time and place of the proceedings. 67.(1)Where a matter is referred to the reflective practice review process, the reviewer must as soon as practicable provide the following to the participating officer, (a)details of the matter that has been referred and the circumstances that are being considered, and. (b)where relevant, specify that the Director General has made a decision under regulation 24(1) to present the case. the officer concerned or the officers police friend may provide any relevant documents to the investigator. (4)A case to which paragraph 16, 18 or 19 of Schedule 3 to the2002 Act(investigations) applied may only be withdrawn, (a)on the direction of the Director General, following consultation with the appropriate authority, in a case where the Director General, (i)made a recommendation under paragraph 25(4C)(c) of that Schedule (duties with respect to disciplinary proceedings) which the appropriate authority accepted, or, (ii)gave a direction under paragraph 23(5A)(e) or paragraph 27(4)(a) of that Schedule to bring disciplinary proceedings, or. the power referred to in paragraph (9) to apply for an extension of the periods of time referred to in paragraphs (2) and (6) lies with the Director General and not with the appropriate authority or the originating authority. (9)The person determining the appeal must determine the procedure at the appeal meeting and, in so far as it is set out in these Regulations, must determine it in accordance with these Regulations. (a)where functions have been delegated under paragraph (1), appropriate authority, in relation to the exercise of such functions, means the chief officer of police to whom the functions have been delegated; (b)originating authority means the chief officer of police of the force of which the officer concerned is a member which has delegated functions under paragraph (1). HMCIC or an inspector of constabulary nominated by HMCIC. a summary of the issue and any relevant background circumstances; a summary of the reflective practice review discussion; key actions to be undertaken within a specified time period; any lessons identified for the participating officer; any lessons identified for the line management or police force concerned; a specified period of time for reviewing the report and the actions taken. Now that that's out of the way let me address what this "system" is. Police officers are diligent in the exercise of their duties and responsibilities. (b)protect themselves against harm or exploitation. Where the investigator is satisfied that, having regard to the circumstances of the officer concerned, it would be unreasonable to require the officer to attend an interview, the investigator may cause the officer concerned to be given a written notice of enquiry. She only gave me a warning. (b)in submitting any information or by not submitting any information at all under regulation 54 (or, where paragraph 14 applies, regulation 18(1) or 31(2) or (3)) of these Regulations or under regulation 20 of the Complaints and Misconduct Regulations. Paragraph 23(5A) was inserted by section 16 of, and paragraphs 9 and 26(1) and (2) of Schedule 5 to, the Policing and Crime Act 2017. Access essential accompanying documents and information for this legislation item from this tab. (5)Paragraph (1) does not apply in a case where the Director General has made a decision under regulation 24(1) to present a case. (a)whether it appears that the officer concerned should be prevented from future employment or appointment by a person mentioned in section 88C(5) of the 1996 Act (effect of inclusion in police barred list: persons who may not employ or otherwise appoint a barred person)(62); (b)where it appears that the officer concerned should be so prevented, whether disciplinary proceedings are necessary for this purpose; (c)the length of time since the alleged gross misconduct occurred; (d)whether it appears that the officer concerned will be held to account in respect of the alleged gross misconduct through other means, such as criminal or other proceedings; (e)where it appears that a complainant or other person has been harmed (whether physically or psychologically) by the alleged gross misconduct, whether it appears that a decision not to take disciplinary proceedings would adversely affect that person; (f)whether it appears that the officer concerned is unfit to be subject to or to participate in disciplinary proceedings by reason of disability or ill-health, and. (11)Where the appropriate authority fails to make the determination referred to in paragraph (1) or (2) before the end of 15 working days beginning with the first working day after receipt of the report, it must notify the officer concerned of the reason for this. (6)Where a person is to give evidence as a witness at misconduct proceedings, the witness (and any person accompanying the witness) must not be allowed to attend the proceedings before giving evidence. 4B.(1)Before making a Condition C special determination the Director General must give a notification in writing to, (2)A notification under paragraph (1) must. 1996 c. 18. (6)A person nominated by the Director General may, as an observer, attend a misconduct meeting which arises from a case to which, (a)paragraph 18 or 19 of Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act (directed and independent investigations) applied, or, (b)paragraph 16 of Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act (investigations by the appropriate authority on its own behalf) applied and in relation to which the Director General. (a)the finding of the person or persons conducting the misconduct proceedings; (d)any direction that the matter be dealt with under the reflective practice review process. (10)Any such application must set out the period of the required extension and the reasons for the application. at the beginning, there were inserted Subject to paragraph (6A),; misconduct or and or neither were omitted; in paragraph (2), for the words from amount, in the first place that word occurs, to the end, there were substituted not amount to gross misconduct, it must take no further action.; for the words from misconduct or to the end, there were substituted gross misconduct, the matter must be investigated.; in paragraph (6), at the beginning, there were inserted Subject to paragraph (6A),; after paragraph (6), there were inserted, The appropriate authority must take no action or no further action under paragraph (1), (5) or (6) if , it is satisfied that the officer concerned is unfit for disciplinary proceedings to be brought against the officer by reason of disability or ill-health, or. (a)the notice given to the officer concerned under regulation 51(1); (b)the other documents given to the officer under regulation 51(1); (c)the documents provided by the officer under. (3)Before referring a matter to the reflective practice review process or to be dealt with under the Performance Regulations, the appropriate authority must consult the line manager of the officer concerned. the Police (Conduct) (Amendment) Regulations 2014(, the Police (Conduct) (Amendment) Regulations 2015(, the following provisions of the Police (Conduct, Complaints and Misconduct and Appeal Tribunal) (Amendment) Regulations 2017(. This site additionally contains content derived from EUR-Lex, reused under the terms of the Commission Decision 2011/833/EU on the reuse of documents from the EU institutions. Amendments are cited elsewhere in these Regulations, where relevant. paragraph (7) applies except in so far as it specifies the period of time for making an objection; the objection must be made before the end of 3 working days beginning with the first working day after the officer concerned is given the notice referred to in paragraph (10); paragraphs (8) to (10) apply, with the exception of the requirement in paragraph (10) for the appropriate authority to give written notice of the effects of paragraphs (11) and (12). 57.(1)Subject to paragraph (2), the officer concerned must attend the accelerated misconduct hearing. (a)the date on which the allegation came to the attention of the appropriate authority; (b)the date on which notice was given under regulation 17(1); (i)the investigation will be concluded, and. (8)Prior to the misconduct proceedings, the appropriate authority or, as the case may be, the originating authority, must supply the officer concerned with, (a)a list of the documents supplied under paragraph (6), and. Part 3 deals with investigations. (a)consider any lists of proposed witnesses; (b)consider any documents supplied under paragraph (6), and. If you are stopped again, the Trooper will be able to see when, where and for what you were warned. Section 50(2A) was inserted by section 82(12) of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 (c. 13) (the 2011 Act); section 50(3) was substituted by paragraphs 1 and 3 of Schedule 22 to the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 (c. 4) (the 2008 Act); sections 50(3A) to (3G) and 51(2B) to (2H) were inserted by section 29(1) to (3) of the Policing and Crime Act 2017 (c. 3) (the 2017 Act) (the powers in sections 50(3A) and 51(2B) are limited by section 29(7) of the 2017 Act) and amended by paragraph 65(2) of Schedule 9 to the 2017 Act; section 50(4) was amended by paragraphs 1 and 3 of Schedule 22 to the 2008 Act and by paragraphs 1 and 32 of Schedule 16 to the 2011 Act; section 51(2)(ba) was inserted by section 35 of the Police Reform Act 2002 (c. 30) (the 2002 Act) and amended by paragraphs 1 and 4(2) of Schedule 22 to the 2008 Act; section 51(2A) was inserted by paragraphs 1 and 4 of Schedule 22 to the 2008 Act; section 51(3A) was inserted by section 128(1) of the Police Act 1997 (c. 50) and amended by paragraphs 1 and 33 of Schedule 16 to the 2011 Act; section 84 was substituted by paragraphs 1 and 7 of Schedule 22 to the 2008 Act and amended by paragraphs 1 and 40 of Schedule 16 to the 2011 Act and section 29(1) and (4) of, and paragraph 65(3) of Schedule 9 to, the 2017 Act. Paragraph 6(2A) to (2E) of Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act was inserted by paragraphs 5 and 6(1) and (3) of Schedule 5 to the Policing and Crime Act 2017. Since it's a minor infraction, the officer can use discretion and decide to just give you a warning rather than the ticket. (8)Any such application must set out the reasons for the application. (15)The persons conducting the misconduct proceedings must review the facts of the case and decide whether the conduct of the officer concerned amounts to misconduct, gross misconduct or neither.; (i)in paragraph (17), At misconduct proceedings conducted by a panel, were omitted. (2)An officer who is suspended under this regulation remains a police officer for the purposes of these Regulations. (3)The officer concerned must provide the appropriate authority with a copy of any document they intend to rely on at the misconduct proceedings. (2)The officer concerned must give the appropriate authority. (b)in paragraph (5), conducting or were omitted; (c)in paragraph (6), for are senior officers there were substituted were senior officers at the relevant time. (7)Where the appropriate authority publishes a report in accordance with paragraph (5), it must publish the notice on its website for a period of not less than 28 days. (5)The appropriate authority must as soon as practicable give the officer concerned written notice of. (b)left with a person at, or sent by recorded delivery to, the officers last known address; (c)given to the officer in person by the officers police friend where the police friend has agreed with the appropriate authority to deliver the notice or document, or. where sub-paragraph (a) does not apply, may direct that the case be withdrawn. where the witness is a police officer, cause that person to be ordered to attend the misconduct proceedings, and. 62.(1)Where the person conducting or chairing the accelerated misconduct hearing finds that the conduct of the officer concerned amounts to gross misconduct, they must impose disciplinary action, which, subject to the provisions of this regulation, may be. (a)P ceased to be a police officer before the allegation first came to the attention of a relevant body, and. 3.(1)Subject to paragraph (2), the following are revoked. ILLINOIS STATE POLICE DIRECTIVE . the appropriate authority has made reasonable enquiries in order to determine the last known address of the officer but it has been unsuccessful. (5)Where the appropriate authority determines, (a)that the special conditions are not satisfied, or. the Director General or the Director Generals relevant lawyer, where the Director General made a decision under regulation 24(1) to present the case, where representations are received in relation to mitigating circumstances, must consider whether those circumstances have been mentioned at an earlier stage in the proceedings and, if they have not been so mentioned, whether the officer could reasonably have been expected to so mention them, and. (5)The chair must notify the officer concerned in writing whether it upholds or rejects an objection to any panel member. (b)may consider such documentary evidence as would, in their opinion, assist them in determining the question; (ii)if the officer is legally represented, the officers relevant lawyer or, where the officer is not legally represented, the officers police friend; (iii)the appropriate authority or the person appointed to represent such authority in accordance with regulation 8(5), and. (5)This paragraph applies where a final written warning was in force on the date of the severity assessment under regulation 14(1) of these Regulations or under regulation 16 of the Complaints and Misconduct Regulations. Paragraph 29 of Schedule 3 to the 2002 Act provides that, for the purposes of Part 3 of that Schedule, the Standards of Professional Behaviour are the standards described in and established by regulations made by the Secretary of State. (ii)where the investigation has been completed, on request and subject to the harm test, a copy of the investigators report or such parts of that report as relate to the officer. Where an investigation is not completed within a period of 12 months, the appropriate authority must provide specified information to the local policing body. the first relevant period is the period of 12 months beginning with the day on which the allegation first came to the attention of the appropriate authority; each subsequent relevant period is the period of 6 months beginning with the day after the end of the previous relevant period. (6)This paragraph applies where it is decided at misconduct proceedings that the officers conduct amounts to misconduct and the decision is based on the officers conduct arising from more than one incident and those incidents are not closely factually connected. (4)In the case of joint misconduct proceedings, where a date and time is specified under paragraph (1) and one or more of the officers concerned or their police friend will not be available at that time, the chair must, (a)consult each of the officers concerned as regards the timing of the misconduct pre-hearing, and. in paragraph (2), conducting or were omitted; in sub-paragraph (a), for conduct or, as the case may be, chair, there were substituted chair; in sub-paragraph (b), conducting or, as the case may be, were omitted; conduct or, as the case may be, were omitted; in paragraph (6), and (7) were omitted; in paragraph (1)(b), conducting or were omitted; in paragraph (2)(a), (b) and (c), misconduct or and , as the case may be were omitted; in paragraph (2)(c)(ii), person or were omitted. 20.(1)Where an investigator wishes to interview the officer concerned as part of the investigation, the investigator must, if reasonably practicable, agree a date and time for the interview with the officer. (a)in paragraph (1), for sub-paragraph (c), there were substituted. (c)has a duty under paragraph 27(4)(b) of that Schedule (duties with respect to disciplinary proceedings etc.) Part 7 also amends the Police Barred List and Police Advisory List Regulations 2017 (S.I. (a)it relates to a person who ceased to be a police officer before 15th December 2017(36); or. 1965/536 to which there are amendments not relevant to these Regulations. where the officer is a member of a police force, a person nominated by the officers staff association. (e)the conduct that is the subject matter of the case and how that conduct is alleged to amount to misconduct or gross misconduct, as the case may be, as set out in the notice given in accordance with regulation 30(1)(a). See section 101(1) of the Police Act 1996 for the definition of local policing body. (b)fall before the end of the period of 5 working days beginning with the first working day after the day specified by the investigator. Having your information in proper order is not enough to get you off with just a warning. Tickets and citations are documents that charge you with a violation of traffic law. to the officer in accordance with regulation 51(1). accompany the officer to any interview, meeting or hearing which forms part of any proceedings under these Regulations. (16)The person or persons conducting the misconduct proceedings must not find that the conduct of the officer concerned amounts to misconduct or gross misconduct unless, (a)they are satisfied on the balance of probabilities that this is the case, or. (4)The person conducting or chairing the misconduct meeting must, if reasonably practicable, agree a date and time for the misconduct meeting with the officer concerned. (2)This paragraph applies to a case where, (a)it is a case in respect of which the duty referred to in regulation 23(9)(a) arises, and. (3)Having considered any representations received under regulations 33(8)(f), 36(3) and 36(5), the person conducting or chairing the misconduct proceedings may. (4)The appropriate authority may not suspend a police officer under this regulation unless the following conditions (the suspension conditions) are satisfied, (a)having considered temporary redeployment to alternative duties or an alternative location as an alternative to suspension, the appropriate authority has determined that such redeployment is not appropriate in all the circumstances of the case, and, (b)it appears to the appropriate authority that either, (i)the effective investigation of the case may be prejudiced unless the officer concerned is so suspended, or. any criminal proceedings have concluded (whatever the outcome of those proceedings). A warning is just thata warning. they are satisfied on the balance of probabilities that this is the case, or. (16)The parties must comply with any directions issued under paragraph (15). I think it's safe to assume that you signed your warning so the officer could later say "she was advised to slow down, she signed the warning." Entering it into the ticket system is basically a more involved method of recording the stop.