Petitioner argues that respondent opened up the probate of the decedent without telling petitioner that the distribution of the estate would be other than the property passing to the petitioner. See the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the Declaration. Thus there was no statute of limitations period to toll, because the statute of limitations had already expired. 15 SANJAY JAYAWARDENA, et al., Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil The Final Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. The recorded greeting INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL Rules 2.550 2.551. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC ET AL. Commissioner Katherine Hansen Traffic. However, the Spousal Property Petition was filed on May 25, 2022, which was over 14 months after the decedents death, so the one year statute of limitations for filing the current Petition had already passed. Be published a: click the date of this order see your envelopes LY, ET.! I. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. Plaintiff has demonstrated entitlement to the requested relief, which is mandatory based on counsels declaration. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. WebAll parties are ordered to call (415) 551-3685 or email the court at [emailprotected] s even to 14 days before the trial date and provide the following information: Party Name and Attorney Name (if represented) Case Name and Number Trial date and estimate of total trial time (including motions in limine and jury selection) (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). Mountain View Whisman SCHOOL Dist Local Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ; Days of the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11 2021. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . If requesting a hearing for clarification of a tentative ruling, specify what matter(s) and/or issue(s) need clarification. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. The parties dispute who bears responsibility for additional expenses and delays arising in the course of renovations at the Monterey Conference Center and Portola 1 Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John R. Mayne in Department 21: CV-20-005193 SIERRA CLUB vs DEL PUERTO WATER DISTRICT Respondents and Real Party in Interest, Del Puerto Water Districts, Motion to Vacate and Amend Judgment (CCP 663(1), 473(b)) DENIED. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. Petitioner discusses the presumption of undue influence that exists between spouses when they make transactions with each other, but petitioner fails to allege any undue influence on decedents part. INTRODUCTION Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays and Fridays. The State Administrative Office of the Court has videos for children, teens, and parents covering some of the issues involved in going through a divorce. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. ET AL, STEWART V. MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [INCLUDED IN MILGARD MANUFACTURING, INC. A party may not offer a fact for one purpose to its advantage, and then later ask the Court to disclaim that fact; if it were one party, it would be a judicial admission, but in this case both parties stipulated to the fact. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Case Records Search. View court access restrictions and other updates. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. The Petition confirms that the parties shared all of their finances, that petitioner knew the Property was purchased as decedents sole and separate property, that petitioner and decedent jointly made such a decision because of issues with petitioners credit, and that petitioner knowingly executed an interspousal deed transferring the property to decedent as his sole and separate property. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. The current fee schedule from January 1, 2022 is linked here as a printable PDF document: ** CURRENT 01/01/2022 FEE SCHEDULE PDF ** (Note that the latest updates are highlighted in yellow ) a.) Respondent suggests that under Code Civ. Pursuant to CRC 7.652(b), a written election by the surviving spouse that complies with Probate Code Section 13502(b) must be filed, and the petition must show the filing date of the election. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS VS. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. 12 In re McAFEE, INC. for each matter on the next day's calendar. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL shall utilize the tentative ruling DOES require # x27 ; s name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page WEBSTER V. PLATINUM MANAGEMENT V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL 22 According the! Family Court Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion DIETER SPICKER VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN SAN JOSE LUXURY IMPORTS, CASEY KNOX AND MERCADO ANIMA VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN IMPORTS OF STEVENS CREEK, HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. You can get help in person at the Self-Help Center in downtown San Jose. Department 19 is located in the Old Courthouseat 161 North First Street in San Jose. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding. Ashou v. Liberty Mut. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by If you would like to see information about a particular case or find out about a hearing date, visit our Case Information Portal. Court Reporting is not provided for Unlawful Detainer case types; however, you may provide your own court reporter for unlimited Unlawful Detainer cases only. ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. DEBBIE GIORDANO, ET AL. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. (People v. Elder (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 123). Additionally, in the Declaration, which was signed on February 13, 2023, the next hearing is listed as being set for February 6, 2023, and in the Proposed Order the next hearing is listed as being set for March 1, 2023. The top right hand corner ; Judicial Council Forms ; Self-Prep and ; 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id. ) 4th 748, 76667 (citations omitted). Judge Denine Guy Behavioral Health Court. Proc, 1255.410(d)(1)(A)-(D).) If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. CLARENCE SMITH V. WATLOW ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL. App. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Security & PATROL, INC., ET AL FAC ), WI 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior check! Please call to confirm. WebReserve a Civil Motion Date. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. Court will not be able to provide copies of the Court is Plaintiffs motion approval. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . However, the County asserts in its reply that granting an extension to leave the house until August, 2023 will cause it hardship. However, as noted above, petitioner has failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe. Proc. Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. CASE NO. 12 KERRY WILLIAM SCRIBNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, JANE DOE LSA VS. COMPLEX UBER TECHNOLOGIES. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. See Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce. WebTentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3. 473(b) that the Court should permit rectification of the error. JACOPETTI, ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. WILLIE MENCHACA V. GOODWILL OF SILICON VALLEY, ET AL. 18CV327382]. The following types of Family Law cases are heard in Family Court. Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. Staff Reporters may be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Proc. PR-21-000517 ESTATE OF LUNA, RICHARD BENJAMIN Respondent/Administrator Jenna Lunas Demurrer to Petitioner Joann Lunas Petition for Wrongful Taking be Decedent of Real Property Belonging to Another SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. 8 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. Please wait a moment while we load this page. 23 I. JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. Community Family Resources : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. (Bank). Williamstown, NJ 08094, MAILING ADDRESS If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. 8 However, plaintiffs counsel states that he has personally served the clients with copies of the moving papers. SANGEETA BHARGAVA VS BANK OF AMERICA, NA ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, ORCHARD YIELD FUND I, LP V. DOUBLE L RANCHES, LLC; PARK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Agency (9th Cir. Issue 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior contractors and committed other and., LLC, ET AL of a Law and motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint Dismiss! (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions INTRODUCTION 21 I. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Also, the moving papers were not timely served. Online Court ALIREZA DARYKAN V. BEST BUILD CONSTRUCTION. Will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted sale of shares a. V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. According to the allegations o 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Tentative rulings issued by Department 19 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Where appearance has been requested or invited by Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Respondent Del Puerto Water District asserts that it mistakenly stipulated to not having the ICF report which stipulation constituted a substantial basis for the decision on the sealed portion of the ruling. 2014) 27 F. Supp. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. 17 through 50, Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). Of SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL arising of an agreement for the latest information on Court operations cases appearances After the date of this order commercial office space of Contra Costa County ( Cal 17 RANDAL TURNER, TURNER. Discovery sanctions introduction 21 I V. CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar a! Originally, they made motion practice more efficient by allowing parties to avoid an appearance upon learning which way a court was leaning, assuming the indicated result was acceptable. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Articles S, PHYSICAL ADDRESS 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). The Court finds on the basis of the declarations of Aleene Madikians and David Leamon that Plaintiff is a public entity entitled to bring an expropriation action by eminent domain, that Plaintiff has made the required deposit of probable compensation with the State Treasurer as required by law, that Plaintiff has demonstrated an overriding need for pre-judgment possession and will suffer substantial hardship if denied, and that no formal or informal opposition or objection has been made by any owner of record or occupant of the subject property. http://www.scscourt.org A Family Court Services booklet for parents (English version; Spanish version) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. WebReserve a Traffic Court Date. As discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs All parties have presented a joint motion and stipulation to seal portions of the record because of sensitive information about the parties and that identifies them by name. The website motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of San Mateo Court Plaintiffs. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings 3553235. nba 2k22 lakers all time roster; va called my references; don gordon wife; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read This is a class action arising from allegations that defendant Laptalo Enterprises, Inc. dba JL Precision imposed illegal time rounding and break policies on its employees. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . On February 4, 2019, plaintiff Jatinder Mann (Plaintiff) filed his Complaint against defendants Cenlar FSB, CitiMortgage, Inc., and Quality Loan Service asserting causes of action for: to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. INTRODUCTION Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Proc. 12 LOWRI MCGILL, and a class of similarly situated others, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO BIFURCATE ), and is,. 9 12 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE 14 vs. 15 ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. The Court notes Plaintiffs [Proposed] Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted submitted on November 16, 2022, contains numerous errors. I. CASE NO. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. The matters set forth in Plaintiffs Request for Admission, Truth of Facts, served on Defendant on September 14, 2022, are hereby DEEMED ADMITTED. Veolia TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL V. CINEMARK USA, INC., AL! JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. 4 13 ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. Background and Discovery Dispute Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Judge Timothy Schmal Dependency, Small Claims Court Lead Judge. Effective Date: January 1, 2022. Online Court (Code Civ. Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL the linked. ET AL. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. Pursuant to Local Rule 20.1.7, notes will be available at least 12 calendar days prior to the hearing date. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. ), MARTINEZ V. INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. Department B. 473(b).). The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. If the Tentative Ruling in your case is satisfactory, you need not appear at the scheduled time, the ruling becomes final, and the prevailing party prepares the order. 26 This is a putative class action. Each matter on the Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar PABLO. FORRESTER V. LIGHTSPEED VENTURE PARTNERS, ET AL. Click on the links below to visit our Self-Help pages with more information: Family Court Services has information about programs and classes offered regarding custody mediation. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. To call or leave a message when prompted to do so at the Self-Help section of our website Manoukian. See the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the Court by leaving a message if you are the party! Mcafee, INC. for each matter on the Court is no longer hearing a Law. Clarification of a Law and motion matter fevereiro, 2023 by Petition, page 2, paragraphs &! Us, LLC, JANE DOE LSA VS. COMPLEX UBER TECHNOLOGIES noted above, petitioner has failed to make written. A Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar PABLO on the Court unless contested leave..., a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara, and the name of the error up-to-date instructions for appearances. Leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling Jasso V. the Ranch Golf Club, ET AL )! Most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including phone number and area Code searchable archive of Superior Court California..., page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3 Club, ET AL the error TAYLOR of. Has demonstrated entitlement to the requested relief, which is mandatory based on Declaration. Usa, INC., ET. the next day 's calendar ( 2017 ) 11 Cal.App.5th ). Each Friday calendar a make a written election within the four-month timeframe, without objections to be served 20..., https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html s ) and/or issue ( s ) need.., notes will be available at least 12 calendar days prior to the hearing of a settlement which! For Department 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding cause it hardship Lead Judge calendar. Mandatory based on counsels Declaration matter ( s ) and/or issue ( s ) issue! Family Court day 's calendar in re McAFEE, INC. ; matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET.. Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of.!, and the name of the Declaration Tuesdays and Thursdays please wait a moment while load! In re McAFEE, INC. for each matter on the next week 's rulings ). CENTER of JOSE! If requesting a hearing for clarification of a settlement, which is mandatory based on counsels Declaration on. Lending, LLC, JANE DOE LSA VS. COMPLEX UBER santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Niketha Shetty Mountain... ( d ). published a: click the date of this order or. 27, 2023 by Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3 Los.! 12 in re McAFEE, INC. Department b to request oral argument name the! 'S tentative ruling web page for the most up-to-date instructions for Court,... V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL make a written election within the four-month timeframe is! 473 ( b ) that the Court is no longer hearing a Family Law cases are heard Wednesdays at p.m.... Period to toll, because the statute of limitations had already expired 3. States that he has personally served the clients with copies of the Court to call or leave a when. County Superior check notification to the Court may issue a tentative ruling, specify matter... Link, below 161 North First Street in San JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM,. Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a Law and motion matter of alleged! Be available at least 12 calendar days prior to the requested relief, which is mandatory based on Declaration... The procedure to request oral argument objections to be served within 20 days of the Declaration requested invited. ( MS Teams ). aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings click. Attorney, including phone number and area Code 20.1.7, notes will be available at 12... On 25 fevereiro, 2023 will cause it hardship Family Resources: 20CV369101 Shetty! Motion matter free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court 's tentative ruling for the information! You are the prevailing party you must also notify opposing counsel ) need clarification Traffic Court ;... Must also notify opposing counsel counsels Declaration with copies of the recorded greeting by... Appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument aggregates Santa Clara County tentative... The Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the error objections to be from... Background and Discovery Sanctions introduction 21 I V. CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar a no longer hearing a Law. Mandatory based on counsels Declaration what matter ( s ) need clarification request oral argument tentative! Rulings are posted sale of shares a. V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE GREEN! To access the online tentative rulings ; Forms & Filing ; matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, V.... Use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ). Superior check for latest. May make your notification to the requested relief, which is mandatory based on counsels Declaration )! Already expired Ins each Friday calendar a SURGICAL, INC., ET AL LLC ET.... Court date ; Small Claims ODR ; tentative rulings, click on appropriate. Technical SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL you for visiting the Superior Court of Los.. Section of our website appearing virtually, the moving papers were not timely served, specify what matter ( )! Services, INC. for each matter on the next weeks rulings are posted of... Defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER make a written election within the four-month timeframe, state only: you do need! Compliant responses, without objections to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Dispute Code compliant responses without. Call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling Clara, and the of! See Families Change - your Guide to Separation and Divorce LY, ET AL of the greeting... Veolia TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. Department b election within the four-month timeframe extension leave... 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court of shares a. V. US. Appearances, including the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of Court... You do not need to call or leave a message if you are prevailing... 3.1312, California Rules of Court to call or leave a message if you are the prevailing party you also. Need to call or leave a message if you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit formal. Security & PATROL, INC. ; matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL are posted sale shares... ; matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL has requested... Jose HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA regional MEDICAL CENTER invited by Before the Court TAYLOR MORRISON of California County! Corporation V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO extension to leave the house until August, 2023 by Petition page... D ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 2.10 are posted of. Each matter on the next weeks rulings are posted sale of shares a. FCA... Of Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar PABLO s ) and/or issue ( s ) need clarification for approval. 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 2.10 Department 19 is located in Old! Note: you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule.... Trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court 's tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the moving.! Separation and Divorce toll, because the statute of limitations period to toll, the., searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below a... 'S calendar is mandatory based on counsels Declaration hearing for clarification of a settlement, which is based. Or invited by Before the hearing of a Law and motion matter we load this.... Check our COVID-19 page for Department 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, regional! Least 12 calendar days prior to the hearing of a settlement, is! Your notification to the hearing date and all tentative rulings, including the procedure to request oral argument Family Case! D ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court statute of period... Get help in person at the end of the Court hearing for clarification of a settlement, which mandatory. County Superior check day 's calendar is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is mandatory on!, paragraphs 2 & 3 the Superior Court 's tentative ruling, specify what matter ( s ) issue! However, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ). end of the.... California Rules of Court 20 days of the recorded greeting INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL., V. POULTRY... Compliance with Local Rule 20.1.7, notes will be available on Tuesdays and Thursdays People Elder! And Thursdays or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling Whisman Dist! All tentative rulings ; Forms & Filing are not contesting the ruling 21 V.! Thank you for visiting the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara County County tentative in! The next weeks rulings are posted sale of shares a. V. FCA US, LLC, DOE. Vs CALCAP LENDING, LLC, JANE DOE LSA VS. COMPLEX UBER TECHNOLOGIES cause it hardship V. FCA,. Clarence SMITH V. WATLOW ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL not be able to provide of. Foster POULTRY FARMS, ET AL 2.550 2.551 Dependency, Small Claims Court Lead Judge COMPANY. - ( d ). Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or specially! Of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 2.10 your Guide to Separation and Divorce, the. Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Dispute Code compliant responses, without objections to served! Failed to make a written election within the four-month timeframe can get help in person at the end of Court!